A Framework for Heuristic Reasoning About Uncertainty
نویسندگان
چکیده
This paper describes a theory of reasoning about uncertainly, based on a representation of state'i of certainly called endorsements (see Cohen and Grinberg, 1983, for a more detailed discussion of the theory.) The theory of endorsements is an alternative to numerical methods for reasoning about uncertainty, such as subjective Bayesian methods (Shortliffe and Buchanan, 1975; Duda, Hart, and Nilsson, 1976) and the ShaferDempster theory (Shafer, 1976). The fundamental concern with numerical representations of certainty is that they hide the reasoning that produces them and thus limit one's reasoning about uncertainty. While numbers are easy to propagate over inferences, what the numbers mean is unclear. The theory of endorsements represents the factors that affect certainty and supports multiple strategies for dealing with uncertainty.
منابع مشابه
Query Processing and Optimization for Logic Programs with Certainty Constraints
Numerous logic frameworks have been proposed for modeling uncertainty and reasoning with such data. While different in syntax, the approaches of these frameworks have been classified into “annotation based” (AB) and “implication based” (IB). In this paper, we present a unified framework which allows evaluating programs in either approach. It extends existing query processing techniques to handl...
متن کاملA Unifying Model for Representing and Reasoning About Context under Uncertainty
Modeling and reasoning about context under uncertainty is a major challenge in context-aware computing. This paper proposes a novel approach to represent context in a unifying way and to perform reasoning about context represented with that model, under uncertainty. We develop a novel reasoning approach based on MultiAttribute Utility Theory as the means to integrate heuristics about the relati...
متن کاملMeta-Reasoning: Monitoring and Control of Thinking and Reasoning.
Meta-Reasoning refers to the processes that monitor the progress of our reasoning and problem-solving activities and regulate the time and effort devoted to them. Monitoring processes are usually experienced as feelings of certainty or uncertainty about how well a process has, or will, unfold. These feelings are based on heuristic cues, which are not necessarily reliable. Nevertheless, we rely ...
متن کاملReconciling intuitive physics and Newtonian mechanics for colliding objects.
People have strong intuitions about the influence objects exert upon one another when they collide. Because people's judgments appear to deviate from Newtonian mechanics, psychologists have suggested that people depend on a variety of task-specific heuristics. This leaves open the question of how these heuristics could be chosen, and how to integrate them into a unified model that can explain h...
متن کاملEvidential Equilibria in Static Games: Heuristics and Biases in Strategic Interaction
Standard equilibrium concepts in game theory find it diffi cult to explain the empirical evidence for a large number of static games such as prisoner’s dilemma, voting, public goods, oligopoly, etc. Under uncertainty about what others will do in one-shot games of complete and incomplete information, evidence suggests that people often use evidential reasoning (ER), i.e., they assign diagnostic ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 1983